Guardianship cases tend to be highly emotional family-centered matters and a change of position and desire to discontinue the case is not unusual. In fact, the petition may provide the impetus to resolve the underlying issues that led to the filing. Withdrawing a guardianship petition is more complicated than a review of the CPLR would suggest. The conundrum is a result of the tension between the desire to terminate resolved cases and the risk of allowing the withdrawal of a case where a vulnerable person is left unprotected. Two recent opinions cast doubt upon the applicability of CPLR Section 3217, (voluntary discontinuance) to guardianship cases.

CPLR Section 3217

CPLR Section 3217, establishes a graduated, three-step process for discontinuance. The requirements become more rigorous as the case progresses. 

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]