The American Lawyer | Commentary
By Colleen M. Kenney, Matt S. Jackson, and Robert D. Keeling | December 13, 2023
Sidley Austin details findings of a test of GPT-4's ability to step in on e-discovery, offering the pros and cons of using the tool for document review.
By Cassandre Coyer | December 7, 2023
The Cecilia AI platform comes with a suite of features, including Cecilia Q&A, Cecilia Timelines and the new Cecilia Auto Review, which begins private access this month.
By Cassandre Coyer | December 1, 2023
The definition of a custodian in e-discovery has evolved significantly over the years, along with its importance, as data volumes and types have exploded. E-discovery experts expect that generative AI will add one more twist to this trend.
By Cassandre Coyer | November 10, 2023
Many countries, from China to France, come with their unique data transfers mechanisms. "There is no standardization," noted Rohan Massey, partner at Ropes & Gray, during a panel discussion at the Georgetown University Law Center's annual Advanced eDiscovery Institute conference on Friday.
By Stephanie Wilkins | November 10, 2023
DISCO, along with current CFO Michael Lafair and former CEO Kiwi Camara, were named in a class action complaint filed in New York State court alleging violations of federal securities laws for misleading investors following the company's IPO. This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.
By Cassandre Coyer | November 10, 2023
A panel of judges at the Georgetown University Law Center's annual Advanced eDiscovery Institute conference explored some of the takeaways from this year's discovery case law, from what ESI protocols should look like to the grounds for relevancy redactions.
By Ryan Hemmel, ProSearch | November 10, 2023
An overview of the latest Microsoft 365 features available and coming soon to improve discovery.
By David Kalat, BRG | November 6, 2023
In November 1958, Hans Peter Luhn created a machine with the seemingly magical ability to process human language, efficiently sifting and sorting words—also known as keywords, which would be come a cornerstone of e-discovery and other legal process.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Patricia E. Antezana | October 31, 2023
One mechanism that courts can use to limit discovery is Federal Rule 26(b)(2)(C). Rule 26(b)(2)(C) instructs that a court must limit the frequency or extent of discovery if it determines that: "the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or can be obtained from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive; the party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity to obtain the information by discovery in the action; or the proposed discovery is outside the scope permitted by Rule 26(b)(1)."
By Cassandre Coyer | October 27, 2023
Some worry that the California law will increase discovery costs as professionals are forced to deploy more resources earlier on to meet the new requirements.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
East Brunswick Law firm concentrating in plaintiff's personal injury, employment law, medical malpractice and worker's compensation seeks an...
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated Associate Attorneys with 3-7 years of experience working closely wi...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS