A recent opinion from Judge Iain Johnston (N.D. Ill) raises the question of whether spoliating parties should be encouraged to present the following defense at trial: “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, yes the main evidence of this case has been destroyed, but it’s only because my client and my law firm are completely incompetent when it comes to preserving electronic evidence.” Has it really come down to this?

They Said, They Said

This case started with an argument between two employees of CEVA Logistics, Darren Hollis and Phillip Bayer, on the company’s warehouse floor. Mr. Bayer and two others, all white, provided witness statements to their supervisor, Mr. Berkshire, reporting that Mr. Hollis yelled and pushed or grabbed Bayer. Hollis and another witness, both black, provided counterstatements describing Hollis as raising his hands solely to defend himself from Bayer. An additional witness, also black, subsequently provided a declaration stating that he told Berkshire that he never saw Hollis touch Bayer. In this “they said, they said” situation, Berkshire made the decision to terminate Hollis, which occurred less than one week later.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]