A Miami insurance litigator convinced Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal to reverse and remand a ruling, He argued that in an affidavit the plaintiff did not have to file, a triable issue existed based on the underlying law and that a jury—not the trial judge—should determine the reasonableness of an insured’s excuse.

Michael J. Neimand, an attorney for defendant United Automobile Insurance Co., challenged Miami-Dade County Judge Lawrence D. King’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, provider G&O Rehabilitation Center Inc.

Third District Court of Appeal in Miami, FL. (Credit: Candace West) Third District Court of Appeal in Miami, FL. (Credit: Candace West)

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]