Discovery battles are getting ugly in Boyer v. Sears Roebuck & Co., the proposed class-action suit that accuses Sears of myriad illegal debt-collection practices, including harassment of credit-card holders who have fallen into bankruptcy.
In a brief filed in U.S. District Court last week, attorneys Laurence S. Berman and Craig D. Ginsburg of Levin Fishbein Sedran & Berman argue that Sears has “objected to virtually every aspect” of their discovery requests with “boilerplate” objections. So, they say, Sears has provided “almost no information” in response to their interrogatories and not a single requested document.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
