An appeals court decision on Tuesday sent shock waves throughout the class action bar for potentially threatening the ability of lawyers to get approval of national class action settlements in the Ninth Circuit.

In a 2-1 opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that a federal judge in Los Angeles failed to consider potential differences in various state consumer laws—a process called a “choice-of-law” analysis—in finding that common issues predominated in a nationwide class action settlement with Hyundai Motor America Inc. and Kia Motors America Inc. in 2015. The majority relied heavily on the 2012 Ninth Circuit decision in Mazza v. American Honda Motor in vacating certification of the settlement class and remanding the case.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]