C.A. 2nd;
B271781
The Second Appellate District affirmed a trial court order. The court held that a breach of contract action did not arise from protected activity for purposes of the anti-SLAPP statute.
C.A. 2nd; B271781 The Second Appellate District affirmed a trial court order. The court held that a breach of contract action did not arise from protected…
September 25, 2017 at 06:29 PM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd;
B271781
The Second Appellate District affirmed a trial court order. The court held that a breach of contract action did not arise from protected activity for purposes of the anti-SLAPP statute.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS