9th Cir.;
15-55192
The court of appeals reversed a judgment and remanded. The court held that federal law did not preempt California state law banning the sale of foie gras produced by the force-feeding of ducks or geese.
9th Cir.; 15-55192 The court of appeals reversed a judgment and remanded. The court held that federal law did not preempt California state law banning…
September 18, 2017 at 05:59 PM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
15-55192
The court of appeals reversed a judgment and remanded. The court held that federal law did not preempt California state law banning the sale of foie gras produced by the force-feeding of ducks or geese.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS