9th Cir.; 15-15791 The court of appeals vacated a judgment and remanded. The court held that the Department of Labor’s interpretation of a tip…
September 11, 2017 at 06:29 PM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
15-15791
The court of appeals vacated a judgment and remanded. The court held that the Department of Labor’s interpretation of a tip regulation was inconsistent with the regulation and thus not entitled to deference.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
