C.A. 2nd;
B270506

The Second Appellate District affirmed a judgment. In the published portion of its opinion, the court held that because the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 limited the scope a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses to “testimonial” statements only, it similarly limited the scope of the Aranda/Bruton doctrine.