9th Cir.; 16-56843 The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that the Family Movie Act of 2005 did not exempt from liability…
August 28, 2017 at 06:21 PM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
16-56843
The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that the Family Movie Act of 2005 did not exempt from liability for copyright infringement an online streaming service that offered filtered versions of movies and televisions shows.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
