C.A. 1st; A148351 The First Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that where a plaintiff twice provided notice of her intent to sue…
July 07, 2017 at 06:31 PM
1 minute read
C.A. 1st;
A148351
The First Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that where a plaintiff twice provided notice of her intent to sue a heath care provider for professional negligence, the second such notice was mere surplusage and did not toll the applicable statute of limitations.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
