By Jason Morris | March 13, 2020
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California deftly articulated employers' dilemma: "continue to utilize arbitration agreements and risk criminal and civil sanctions or avoid arbitration agreements for fear of non-compliance with a statute that is likely preempted" under the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution.
By Shari Klevens and Alanna Clair | March 3, 2020
Even when attorneys carefully consider the facts and applicable law, in many cases there still remains a likelihood of an outlier result, especially when a jury is involved.
By Ivan Puchalt | February 13, 2020
Given this increased risk, a working knowledge of how to investigate and litigate tree cases, against both private and public entities, is increasingly useful.
By Shari L. Klevens and Alanna Clair | January 7, 2020
Most attorneys are aware of their obligation to protect the attorney-client privilege, including the goal of avoiding of possible waiver resulting from the disclosure of privileged documents to third parties.
By Haylee Saathoff | December 20, 2019
With this new law set to take effect in a matter of weeks, what do California employers need to know?
By Nora Freeman Engstrom and Robert L. Rabin | November 12, 2019
The law, which is the first of its kind, expressly prohibits reductions of damages for lost future earnings in personal injury and wrongful death cases when those reductions are based on race, gender or ethnicity.
By Shari L. Klevens and Alanna Clair | November 5, 2019
Most attorneys are aware that the attorney-client privilege is something to be protected with vigilance at all times. For that reason, attorneys may avoid disclosing any client communications to third parties to guard against any suggestion of waiver.
By Kevin D. Cardona and Jason E. Fellner | October 9, 2019
Despite the many learning opportunities for newer counsel, few attorneys may realize that the same standard of care applies to the legal representation of pro bono clients as it does with paying clients.
By Julie Q. Brush | October 2, 2019
I'm interviewing for a job and want to telecommute one to two days a week, but I don't want to give the impression that I don't want to work hard or it's all I care about. Should I raise the issue immediately or wait?
By Jonathan Solish | September 24, 2019
AB-5 confirms that its express intent is "to codify the decision in the Dynamex case." Even counsel for Uber has characterized AB-5 as a codification of the 2018 Dynamex decision.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS