SAN FRANCISCO — U.S. District Judge William Orrick III found himself in the crossfire of competing interests Tuesday morning when asked to interpret his own temporary restraining order blocking an anti-abortion group from releasing hidden-camera videos.

A handful of state attorneys general have asked the defendants in the case to hand over videos to investigators who are looking into whether Planned Parenthood illegally profited from the supply of fetal tissue to researchers. Meanwhile, California Attorney General Kamala Harris has said her office will review whether the Center for Medical Progress and two individuals named as defendants violated state law when recording the videos at the National Abortion Federation’s annual conferences in 2014 and 2015. Further clouding the situation, defendants have invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]