The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has completed its one-two punch against vaguely worded means-plus-function patent claims.

Sitting en banc, the court ruled that patent claims expressed in terms of functionality will be subject to statutory requirements for means-plus-function claims, even if they substitute phrases such as “a mechanism for” or “a device for” in place of “a means for.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]