Citing claims that the company instructed an employee to sign an arbitration agreement the day she was fired, U.S. District Judge William Alsup called the case "beyond the pale."
May 16, 2013 at 05:23 AM
1 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — It’s gotten awfully hard for lawyers to wriggle out of arbitration agreements in the wake of AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion.
But it’s not impossible, as evidenced by a blistering order handed down by U.S. District Judge William Alsup this week, siding with class action lawyers at Sanford Heisler in an employment case against San Jose computer company Ma Laboratories Inc.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaThe current term of office for United States Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
