C.A. 4th
D060381
The Fourth Appellate District reversed a judgment. The court held that an In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program care provider was not allowed to subcontract his services to another provider.
April 03, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 4th
D060381
The Fourth Appellate District reversed a judgment. The court held that an In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program care provider was not allowed to subcontract his services to another provider.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS