In two recent criminal trials in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, defendants have raised the so-called “mosaic theory” defense to charges of securities fraud. Both defendants were ultimately convicted. Both trials offer lessons about the contours of the defense. Is the mosaic theory a viable defense after the Rajaratnam and Whitman trials?
In general, in order to rise to the level of insider trading, a trade must be based upon confidential, nonpublic information that is “material.” A statement or omission is deemed material when there is “a substantial likelihood that the disclosure of the omitted fact would have been viewed by the reasonable investor as having significantly altered the ‘total mix’ of information made available.” (See TSC Indus. v. Northway, 426 U.S. 438 (1976); Materiality is a mixed question of law and fact and is usually determined by the jury.)
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org