Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
There may not be a literal platter involved, but federal prosecutors in the nation’s capital have apparently produced a juicy head for their L.A. colleagues � who have spent the past five years struggling to indict former plaintiff firm Milberg Weiss and its star partner, William Lerach. That head belongs to John Torkelsen, a notoriously effective expert witness for Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach in dozens of securities suits throughout the 1990s. He’s expected to plead guilty to reporting false information to a government agency in a D.C. federal court Oct. 21. The single count against Torkelsen was filed last month by Washington prosecutors and relates to a venture capital fund he managed � and funded in part with money from Lerach and other plaintiff lawyers. In the past year, the U.S. Small Business Administration has filed civil suits accusing Torkelsen and his associates of using the fund to bilk the SBA out of millions of dollars. The criminal charge against Torkelsen follows a plea deal between the D.C. prosecutors and Torkelsen’s wife on related charges that was unsealed earlier this year. While no plea agreement between Torkelsen and prosecutors has been made public, the way in which Torkelsen was charged � through a criminal information, which bypasses the grand jury process � is only used when a plea deal is in place, say former federal prosecutors. “It typically signals that the two sides have worked out a guilty plea and the defendant has waived his right to be investigated by a grand jury,” said Patrick Robbins, a partner at Shearman & Sterling and a former San Francisco assistant U.S. attorney. Another former San Francisco AUSA, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati partner Leo Cunningham, agreed. “That’s only done when you have a plea deal,” he said. Torkelsen’s lawyer, Powell Goldstein partner Ralph Caccia, did not return phone calls last week. A spokesman for the Washington U.S. attorney’s office said local court rules prohibit comments on pleas before they’re filed. Torkelsen has long been seen as a potential goldmine for prosecutors, say lawyers with knowledge of the investigation. They say his long history of financial ties with Lerach and other plaintiff lawyers, and the persistent accusation that he was paid illegally on a contingent basis � a charge Torkelsen seemed to acknowledge in a 1998 deposition � have made him a coveted witness for prosecutors. But until now, Torkelsen had never cooperated with prosecutors. That began to change earlier this year when his wife, Pamela, entered a guilty plea on charges relating to the venture fund and agreed to cooperate in ongoing investigations. Since the charges against John Torkelsen became public, the Los Angeles prosecutors have signaled a renewed interest in him. In recent weeks, the team, led by Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Robinson, has called securities defense lawyers seeking documents related to Torkelsen, said lawyers familiar with the case. In addition to Torkelsen, prosecutors have recently been interviewing former lead plaintiffs in Milberg Weiss suits. Torkelsen’s cooperation could signify a broadening of the investigation, which originated in 2000 when Steven Cooperman � a convicted felon and former Milberg lead client � told prosecutors that he received illegal kickbacks from the firm. Lawyers for Milberg Weiss and Lerach have denied wrongdoing. Their attorneys declined to comment. Allegations of kickbacks have continued to be the prosecutors’ focus, say lawyers familiar with the probe. With Cooperman’s credibility in question, they have spent years trying to bolster their case with a handful of other former clients. Earlier this year, they indicted Palm Springs lawyer and former Milberg client Seymour Lazar � and his former attorney � for allegedly taking such kickbacks, a move that was widely seen as an attempt to pressure Lazar into testifying. More recently, prosecutors have given immunity to at least two other former clients who claim they received kickbacks, say lawyers familiar with the case. The flurry of recent grand jury activity was surprising to many securities lawyers, since there had been seemingly little activity in the case since 2003. But earlier this year, two new prosecutors were assigned to work with Robinson, said lawyers familiar with the investigation. And they say the Torkelsen plea could also help jumpstart the Milberg effort. Cunningham, who is not involved in the case, says the recent inquiries by L.A. prosecutors � and the aggressive tactics by their D.C. counterparts � would seem to indicate that Torkelsen is a coveted figure. Cunningham said that plea signaled that the prosecutors were serious about getting John Torkelsen. “Squeezing the wife,” he said. “That’s hardball.”

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.