Ninth Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown said the court has “turned a blind eye to the incongruity” of reviewing on interlocutory appeal denials of anti-SLAPP motions to strike “for too long."
September 21, 2023 at 05:00 PM
4 minute read
Litigation editor
Two judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit wrote separately on Thursday critiquing the court’s practice of taking up appeals of failed anti-SLAPP motions.
The ruling considers a motion to strike under California’s anti-SLAPP statute—a law blocking litigation that seeks to silence free speech.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
(L-R) Ninth Circuit Judges M. Margaret McKeown and Roopali H. Desai. Photos: Jason Doiy /ALM; Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
