In many parts of the country, courts are getting jury trials back into full swing. Still, even at this stage of the pandemic, the effects of COVID-19 on trials go further than socially distanced jury boxes and judges behind sneeze guards.
Jury consultants and litigators across the country say the coronavirus is continuing to shape who makes it onto juries and how they are voting.
Are Jurors Too Scared to Serve?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

On March 23, the case of Patrick Julien v. Aboubacar Diabate and Felix Nunezan commenced in person with a full panel of six jurors and two alternates in The New York County Supreme Court at 60 Centre St. Jury selection took place in a courtroom specially outfitted with plexiglass barriers and other safety features in addition mandatory mask wearing, social distancing, and other COVID-19 safety protocols were strictly enforced.

