The four decisions Wednesday by the U.S. Supreme Court featured 11 separate additional opinions, one of which included a sharp-edged jab toward the chief justice.
June 23, 2021 at 03:27 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Whether it’s end of term fatigue, frayed patience or tempers, the four decisions Wednesday by the U.S. Supreme Court featured an unusual number of multiple opinions by justices and a rare jab by Justice Elena Kagan at Chief Justice John Roberts Jr.
There were 11 separate opinions in addition to the four lead opinions and most of the justices had something to say even in cases where the court was unanimous or nearly unanimous.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Justice Elena Kagan testifies before the House Committee on Appropriations during a Supreme Court Budget hearing, on March 7, 2019.
