The first federal appeals court to review a Roundup plaintiff’s verdict came down overwhelmingly in support of the award, including $20 million in punitive damages that it held were justified given that Monsanto was “ignoring Roundup’s carcinogenic risks.”

Friday’s 2-1 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit disagreed with Monsanto that federal law—in particular, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act—preempted plaintiff Edwin Hardeman’s claims that the company had failed to warn about Roundup’s link to non-Hodgkin lymphoma. A federal jury in San Francisco had awarded $80 million to Hardeman, diagnosed with the disease in 2015. U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria reduced the amount to $25.3 million but, finding Monsanto’s conduct “reprehensible,” retained $20 million in punitive damages.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]