X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Tesla automobile factor, Fremont California. (Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM) Tesla automobile factory. (Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM)

Tesla Inc., which is once again without a general counsel, is facing a class action alleging that the company tried to pull a bait-and-switch scheme on its solar roof tile customers. 

The Palo Alto, California-based company initially agreed to install a solar roof energy system at a set cost, but later refused to honor the agreement, the suit alleges, and demanded that customers pay a much higher price. The complaint was filed April 30 in Pennsylvania federal court.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

Library of California Insurance Defense FormsBook

180+ model documents covering preliminary matters through ADR trial, with sample letters, demands, pleadings, motions, certifications, interrogatories, settlement agree...

Get More Information
 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.