X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
(L to R) Buchalter's Julian (Pete) Mack and Dylan Wiseman,(Photo: Courtesy Photo) (L to R) Buchalter’s Julian (Pete) Mack and Dylan Wiseman,(Photo: Courtesy Photo)

On November 12, California’s Fourth Appellate District finalized a ruling which sent a strong message to California employers. Businesses should revisit the scope of their confidentiality agreements to make certain the definition of “Confidential Information” is not so broad that it effectively prohibits former employees from working.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Dig Deeper

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.