Meet the Lawyers Who Want to Overhaul Oracle and Facebook's Boardrooms
When asked if Frank Bottini plans to bring more shareholder derivative lawsuits against Silicon Valley companies who allegedly do not follow through on their diversity initiatives, the Bottini & Bottini lawyer said Oracle is certainly not the only company that lacks diversity in its top ranks.
July 08, 2020 at 04:09 PM
8 minute read
Two shareholder derivative lawsuits filed last week demanding that Oracle and Facebook each replace three of their board members with Black and minority leaders did not mince any words.
The suits started with pictures of mainly white board members and executive leadership teams. They alleged that Oracle and Facebook were known to have "the oldest and most egregious 'Old Boy's Club' in Silicon Valley." The lawsuits also said that "[i]f Oracle simply disclosed that it does not want any Black individuals on its Board, it would be racist but honest." And "[a]t Facebook, apparently Zuckerberg wants Blacks to be seen but not heard."
Frank Bottini of Bottini & Bottini in La Jolla, California, and Louise Renne of Renne Public Law Group in San Francisco jointly filed the lawsuit against Oracle, and Bottini & Bottini took on Facebook alone. Bottini said he hopes the powerful language in the complaint gets people's attention. "We need them to take action now to be good corporate citizens and actually do what they say they're trying to do," he said.
We sat down with the pair to discuss the lawsuits. Answers have been edited for length and clarity. Please walk us through the decision to begin the complaint with photos of the mainly white boards and executive management teams.
Bottini: We're talking about diversity, and when you look at these pictures, I think it brings home the glaring lack of diversity at Oracle, both at the board level and executive management. We didn't cherry-pick anything in either complaint. We went to Oracle's website, and we pulled all the top executives as they listed them. When Louise and I were researching the suit, we said let's see what Oracle actually says about diversity. The one that stood out to us was a quote from their proxy statement in 2019 where they say, "Diversity and inclusion in our workforce starts at the top." So we went and looked at the top, and we couldn't find any diversity as far as Blacks. There are some women at the top ranks, which is great, but there's certainly no Blacks.
Renne: Or Latinos or other minorities. What this case is basically about is economic inclusion.
What exactly do you mean by economic inclusion?
Bottini: We did a lot of research into how they treated employees, you can see by the lawsuit filed by the Department of Labor that they alleged based on the specific evidence that the government has accumulated that Oracle underpaid women and minorities by $400 million over a four-year period. So, minorities are not being fairly included on an economic basis. I think it's fair to call it discrimination when you look at them compared to other companies. It's having a very powerful economic impact in a negative way on Blacks and minorities, and that is so important given the climate we're in—really it's a depression that we're facing from COVID-19.
Can you talk about your decision to use that strong and direct language, such as "… Zuckerberg wants Blacks to be seen but not heard?" Bottini: Somebody could say that's strong language, but we think it's appropriate. Again, we looked at the facts. I think when you look at Oracle and Facebook, they use a lot of platitudes. "We're committed to diversity. Inclusion starts at the top. Blah, blah, blah." They're saying they're trying, but they're not successful. If they were honest, they would say, "We want to create the veneer of a company that's committed to diversity and inclusion, but we're not really going to try that hard." We do believe they're lying in their proxy statements. When you file something with the Securities and Exchange Commission, there's a duty to be truthful. So, it's bad enough they're not having success at what they're claiming to do, but we think their representations are not true.
For more on the Future of Law, sign up for What's Next.
You two worked together on the shareholder derivative suit over Google's executive sexual harassment scandal. Did you learn anything from that case that you're bringing to the Oracle litigation?
Bottini: Well, the first takeaway is that it was wonderful working with Louise. We're so fortunate she's still working. She's had such a long and illustrious career.
Renne: I pay him to say these things.
Bottini: This is really kind of a civil rights case. It's a shareholder case, but it has a civil rights element. And Louise has incredible experience in the civil rights area, so that's why she's such a critical member of the team to try to get a good result here.
Renne: We do have a good team. One of my partners is Ruth Bond. She is related to Julian Bond, the civil rights icon. I think between all of us, we do have a commitment to do everything we possibly can to make sure we improve diversity and inclusion, and I think the shareholders feel exactly the same way.
How did you decide the type of relief you're seeking in the suits, specifically asking to replace three board members with Black and minority leaders?
Bottini: The purpose of a shareholder derivative case—you try to get some money from the company, because that's important—but here the thing that's more important is effectuating changes that will have a long-term effect at the company. When we started looking at Oracle, we asked, "What kind of changes would really make a difference at the company and help improve and advance the economic opportunities for Blacks and minorities?" At Oracle, they say diversity and inclusion starts at the top. So with respect to changing out the board members, there are no Blacks on the board, and there are no Blacks among executive management, so that's why there's a request that the message is set at the top. It's hard to claim that you're really trying to do something about it when you don't have a single Black person among the top managers. The other ones are all related to changes that we think corporate governance experts have said are the types of governance practices that can help not only make the changes at a company but make them stick.
We've heard allegations about discrimination at Oracle for some time, and Facebook has been criticized for the lack of racial diversity on its board for several years, as well. What makes now the right time to file this suit?
Bottini: If not now, then when? They're long overdue. It sort of hit me one day when I was thinking about these issues. When you actually go back and look at these proxy statements and what they've filed with the SEC, they're actually lying to shareholders. That's the word I would use. Louise doesn't like the word lying as much.
Renne: I say falsely asserted.
Bottini: Louise has always been a lot more diplomatic than me. I think the time's now, and I think there's a unique opportunity to do more than ever has been done before, and we need to seize the moment. The purpose of this shareholder lawsuit is to say you've made representations, but we think you're not making the efforts you claim you want to make. So, make them or revise your public statements to not contain misrepresentations. You can't have it both ways. And Oracle has been relatively silent in response to the Black Lives Matter movement, isn't that right, Louise?
Renne: That is right. We haven't heard much from Oracle at all. What we've heard is a lot of corporate America saying, "Yeah, we're going to do this, we're going to do that." But when you go and take a look at who is in charge, there are few if any minorities represented at the top. Now it's more than time to turn things around. As Frank said, this is the time, and we need to seize the moment.
Do you plan to file similar lawsuits in the near future?
Renne: Let's just say never say never.
Bottini: There are some other companies—certainly Oracle is not the only one. You can see from Facebook that's another glaring example. And there are some companies that lack diversity at the top. Everybody recognizes, especially in Silicon Valley, that the companies haven't been successful in achieving diversity. Everybody runs it up the flagpole and talks about "Oh yeah, diversity is great. We're all for diversity." Silicon Valley is great at being a cheerleader, but they're not great at achieving real results. That's what needs to change.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHubSpot Chief Legal Officer Departs 'Upon Mutual Agreement' After Just 2 Years
2 minute readOpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
3 minute readElon Musk Has a Lot More Than a 'Tornetta' Appeal to Resolve in Del. Court
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Rejects Firm's Counterclaims Against Former Legal Secretary, Citing Lack of Jurisdiction
- 2Mayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
- 3What We Learned From In-House Litigators in 2024
- 4‘Modern Family’: The Resurgence of Family Office Enterprises
- 5Baker & Hostetler to Open Austin Office With 10-Lawyer Locke Lord Affordable Housing Team
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250