Uber Sues to Force Arbitration in Wrongful Death Suit Involving Man Shot by Driver
The company's lawyers sued in New Mexico federal court to compel arbitration Wednesday in the wrongful death suit brought on behalf of James Porter, a 27-year-old who died last year after being shot by his Uber driver.
May 15, 2020 at 01:27 PM
3 minute read
Lawyers for Uber Technologies Inc. are seeking to force the estate of a New Mexico man who died after being shot by his Uber driver to pursue wrongful death claims against the company in arbitration.
The company's lawyers at Modrall Sperling in Albuquerque, New Mexico, filed a complaint to compel arbitration Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico in the wrongful death suit brought on behalf of James Porter. Porter, a 27-year-old who worked for Hewlett-Packard in Rio Rancho, New Mexico, died after being shot by his Uber driver, Clayton Benedict, on March 17, 2019. Uber's federal complaint came as the company fired motion to compel arbitration in the wrongful death lawsuit pending in New Mexico state court hit the docket. (The federal filing was surfaced by Legal Radar, Law.com's free, personalized news feed.)
According to Uber's suit seeking arbitration, Porter had to agree to the company's U.S. terms of use, which include an agreement to resolve any disputes in arbitration, prior to using the rider app. The suit claims that Dennis Murphy, the personal representative of Porter's estate, is bound to the agreement to arbitrate disputes Porter agreed to at sign-up.
"As the personal representative of Mr. Porter's estate, Defendant Murphy now stands in the shoes of Mr. Porter insofar as he was a party to, and legally obligated to comply with, the Arbitration Agreement included in Uber's Terms of Use," wrote Uber's lawyers. "Therefore, Defendant is bound to resolve all disputes, including 'any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of or relating to … your [Porter's] access to or use of the Services at any time,'" they wrote, citing the terms of the agreement.
Uber representatives and the lawyers listed on the federal complaint, Modrall Sperling's Tim Fields, Nathan Nieman and Jennifer Kittleson, didn't respond to requests for comment.
According to local press reports, Benedict, the Uber driver, shot Porter after pulling over after another passenger with Porter had vomited in Benedict's vehicle on Saint Patrick's Day. The two were allegedly arguing over a $250 cleanup fee when Porter was shot. Local prosecutors had sought to pursue second-degree murder charges against Benedict, but Judge Neil Candelaria of New Mexico's Second Judicial District in August allowed them to move forward with the lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter. The criminal case remains pending against Benedict, who was also named as a defendant in the wrongful death lawsuit.
David Adams, who represents the Porter estate alongside his partner Charles Parnall of Parnall & Adams Law in Albuquerque, said that Uber's efforts to compel arbitration in the case stand in contrast to the company's publicly stated commitment to transparency in dealing with cases of driver assault and sexual harassment.
"The Uber driver at the time of this unfortunate homicide had a documented history of alleged violence, and I am sure Uber will do everything they can to hide this case and story from the public," Adams said by email Friday. "As attorneys that believe in deterrence and the influence of the justice system on the general public, we will challenge their motion so James' story doesn't go untold."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Fierce Battle of Expert Witnesses' Expected in Cybersecurity Spat
'That's Insane': Lawyers Weigh In on Fallout From Uber's User Agreement
7 minute readGC Who Helped Fanatics Pull Off Growth Tear Joins Acquisitive Provider of Live Event Logistics
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250