Church Sues Zoom After Bible Study Hacked With Pornography
Bottini & Bottini and Cotchett, Pitre and McCarthy filed the class action complaint after a bible study class hosted by Saint Paulus Lutheran Church on Zoom was infiltrated by a bad actor.
May 13, 2020 at 07:05 PM
5 minute read
One of the oldest churches in San Francisco is suing Zoom Video Communications Inc. after a hacker infiltrated its virtual bible study and subjected participants to pornography.
The lawsuit, brought by Bottini & Bottini and Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy on behalf of Saint Paulus Lutheran Church, is part of a growing number of legal actions against Zoom, which has gained more than 2.2 million new active users this year. The company's privacy and security practices have come under heightened scrutiny as the platform has emerged as a crucial tool for remote communication during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Saint Paulus Lutheran Church alleges that Zoom's "utter failure in providing security" made it possible for the bible group to be "Zoombombed" with pornography, including videos depicting abuse of children and babies, according to the class action complaint filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
"In Saint Paulus's long history, it survived the Great Earthquake and Fire of 1906, the social and cultural turmoil of the 1960s–70s, and a 1995 fire that destroyed its 103-year-old cathedral building. Never did Saint Paulus imagine falling prey to Zoom's deceptive business practices and sex-offenders' depraved hacking during this unprecedented COVID19 pandemic," wrote the church's lawyers.
Zoom did not respond to a request for comment at the time of publication.
The church is suing the video conferencing platform for negligence and breach of implied contract, as well as violations of state laws including the California Consumer Privacy Act, Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and Unfair Competition Law.
The complaint asserts that on May 6, 42 minutes into an otherwise uneventful bible class, a "known serial offender" began exposing the group to footage of "adults performing sexual acts with each other and on infants and on young children." The session was password protected, according to the lawsuit, meaning it was not open to the general public.
Zoom's trust and safety department responded to the church's incident report by blocking the intruder from joining future meetings using the same Zoom software but refused to take further action, according to the church's lawyers.
"It is baffling, to say the least, how Zoom failed to protect Saint Paulus's bible-study class from a 'serial offender' who has been 'reported multiple times to the authorities,'" they wrote.
The church also reached out to Lynn Haaland, Zoom's deputy general counsel and chief compliance and ethics officer, as well as Zoom's Chief Information Security Officer Richard Farley, and Zoom CEO Eric Yuan. Haaland and Farley did not offer any additional security measures, and Yuan did not respond to the church's emails, according to the complaint.
Zoom has drawn criticism after schools and other organizations flocking to the platform have been targeted by bad actors. In March, Wexler Wallace and Tycko & Zavareei filed the first of several class action complaints against Zoom in the U.S District Court for the Northern District of California. Following a probe led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, last week Zoom agreed to tighten its security measures. The company also came under fire recently after a report from The Intercept found that the company's past claims of end-to-end encryption were unfounded.
"In our current situation, we rely on platforms like Zoom to socialize, work and, as here, pray together remotely," said Mark Molumphy of Cotchett Pitre in Burlingame. "I can't imagine a more horrific violation of privacy than that experienced by Saint Paulus and its bible study class."
Bottini & Bottini's Frank Bottini and Albert Chang said in an email that Zoom's inadequate security allowed a known offender to Zoombomb the bible-study class. "This violation of the church's sanctity was a direct result of Zoom prioritizing profit over user security. Saint Paulus looks forward to proving its case in court on behalf of all victims of Zoom's deceptive business practices and holding Zoom accountable for its misconduct," they said.
Sign up for Law.com's Legal Radar to keep up with the latest news and lawsuits in a free, personalized news feed. Track new federal litigation by industry, practice area, law firm, company and region.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCalifornia Federal Court Grants CoStar Group's Motion to Narrow Claims in Move Inc. Trade Secrets Case
Keker Secures Defense Win for EDA Software Company Real Intent in Synopsys Copyright Infringement Case
Old Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Inside Track: Lawyers for Big Tech Give Harris Benefit of Doubt, Despite Pummeling They Took Under Biden
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250