California Supreme Court Won't Open Jail Doors, but Says Local Courts Have Options
"The time-sensitive nature of this crisis—and it is a crisis—makes this disappointing," Peter Eliasberg, an attorney for the ACLU of Southern California representing the petitioners, said.
May 04, 2020 at 06:44 PM
3 minute read
The California Supreme Court on Monday denied a petition by criminal defense organizations seeking the release of county jail inmates and juvenile detainees to minimize the spread of COVID-19.
Still, the justices said the petitioners had raised issues that "call for prompt attention in a manner that considers the diversity of local conditions." The justices laid out a roadmap for trial courts to follow in considering pleas to reduce inmate populations.
A trial court could "consolidate the action with any similar actions pending in the court" or "transfer and consolidate matters across counties" or even "assign a single bench officer or appoint one or more referees or special masters to bring swift and focused attention to the issues raised," the justices wrote.
"In all such matters, the superior court is to proceed as expeditiously as possible and to be mindful that conditions associated with COVID-19 in detention facilities and local communities are continually evolving," the justices said Monday. The petitioners could file similar claims in the state Supreme Court "if circumstances warrant."
Peter Eliasberg, an attorney for the ACLU of Southern California representing the petitioners, said there's no guarantee that a trial court will consolidate matters or take any actions quickly.
"The time-sensitive nature of this crisis—and it is a crisis—makes this disappointing," Eliasberg said.
A spokesman for petitioner National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers said in an email that the organization is "studying the decision." California Attorneys for Criminal Justice and Youth Justice Coalition joined the NACDL on the petition.
The petitioners were represented by attorneys from Munger, Tolles & Olson and the American Civil Liberties Union.
Attorneys for Gov. Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Xavier Becerra said local officials overseeing the jails have the responsibility to fix any problems contributing to the spread of COVID-19 and that conflicts over such issues are best handled by local trial courts.
County jails and state prisons have become hotspots for the novel coronavirus in some regions. Two Riverside County jail inmates died of COVID-19-related complications over three days last month, according to the Los Angeles Times. As of April 29, 141 inmates had tested positive for the virus. Two Riverside County sheriff's deputies have died from COVID-19, including one who worked at a detention center.
Newsom ordered the prison system to stop admitting new inmates in an effort to slow the spread of the virus in state facilities. The Judicial Council last month attempted to reduce the flow of new inmates to county jails by enacting a $0 bail policy for many offenses.
Some sheriffs and prosecutors have balked at the efforts to reduce detentions, citing a concern for public safety.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeet the Pacific Northwest Judges Who Rejected the Kroger-Albertsons Supermarket Merger
4 minute readJudge's Civil Contempt Order for Zoom Recording Violation Must Include 'The Keys to the Cell,' State Appellate Court Says
4 minute readLawsuit Asks California Supreme Court to Expand Use of Electronic Case Recording
4 minute read'We Will Sue ... Immediately': AG Bonta Says He's Ready to Spend $25M Battling Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250