A federal court has found that the Communications Decency Act protects Snap Inc. from how users deploy the app’s Speed Filter, at a time when calls to roll back Section 230 of the law are growing louder.

U.S. District Judge Michael Fitzgerald of the Central District of California ruled Tuesday that the Speed Filter, Snapchat’s built-in speedometer, is not content created by the company. Instead, the court agreed with Snap’s Munger, Tolles & Olson attorneys that the feature is a content-neutral tool, and can be used for “proper and improper purposes,” preserving the publisher immunity included in Section 230.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]