Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Kevin P. O'Brien Kevin P. O’Brien of Hartog, Baer & Hand.

Before the appellate court’s decision in Barefoot v. Jennings (2018) 27 Cal. App. 5th 1, trust litigators assumed that former trust beneficiaries, i.e., beneficiaries disinherited by a subsequent trust amendment, had standing under Probate Code section 17200 to challenge the validity of that trust amendment in probate court. Barefoot upended this assumption, holding that section 17200 is only available to current trust beneficiaries and that former beneficiaries, like the petitioner in Barefoot, must initiate a separate civil action to seek relief.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.