Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Mexico-U.S. border wall prototypes/photo by CBP Photography/Flickr Mexico-U.S. border wall prototypes/photo by CBP Photography/Flickr

Two starkly different legal views on President Donald Trump’s moves to find funding for construction of barriers at the U.S.-Mexico border, a signature promise of his presidential campaign, were laid bare Tuesday morning at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Ross Todd

Ross Todd is bureau chief of The Recorder in San Francisco. He writes about litigation in the Bay Area and around California. Contact Ross at rtodd@alm.com. On Twitter: @Ross_Todd.

More from this author

Law Firms Mentioned


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.