Erica Mighetto protests outside the San Francisco Uber headquarters on May 8, briefly shutting down traffic, demanding fair wages and fair labor practices. Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM
The company’s lawyers at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher contend in a new court filing that Uber drivers' classification as contractors remains unchanged despite the California Supreme Court’s 'Dynamex' decision, the passage of the state’s AB 5, and a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
October 30, 2019 at 07:37 PM
1 minute read
Litigation editor
Uber drivers still aren’t employees under new case law and California statutes, according to the San Francisco-based ridesharing company’s lawyers.
A Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher team led by Theodore Boutrous Jr. in Los Angeles wrote that “no court has ever found that drivers who use the Uber App are Uber’s employees under any standard,” responding Tuesday to a motion for preliminary injunction in a case asserting that drivers are misclassified as independent contractors.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
