Shoppers walk past a Target department store in Hackensack, New Jersey. (Photo: Northfoto/Shutterstock.com)
This story is reprinted with permission from the Insurance Coverage Law Center, the industry’s only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.
An appellate court in California, affirming a trial court’s decision, has ruled that Target Corporation was not entitled to coverage as an additional insured under a commercial general liability insurance policy purchased by its supplier, McKesson Corporation, for a customer’s lawsuit over an allegedly mislabeled prescription drug.
