California Superior Court, San Francisco.
A San Francisco Superior Court judge has turned back a request from eight retired judges to block changes to the state's assigned judges program which limit lifetime service to 1,320 days—the equivalent of a full-time six-year elected term in the state's trial courts.
July 11, 2019 at 12:57 PM
1 minute read
Editor/columnist
Eight retired state court judges have lost an early bid to block a new policy capping the total amount of days they can fill temporary openings on the state court bench.
The plaintiffs sued the Judicial Council of California and the state’s chief justice in May claiming changes to the program allowing retired judges to fill temporary vacancies, including a 1,320-day limit on service in the so-called assigned judges program, amounted to age discrimination.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
