A California appellate court has ruled that a homeowners’ insurance policy did not cover a lawsuit alleging that the insured shot the owner of a jewelry mart multiple times during an attempted armed robbery.
June 20, 2019 at 07:07 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Insurance Coverage Law Center
This story is reprinted with permission from the Insurance Coverage Law Center, the industry’s only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.
A California appellate court, affirming a trial court’s decision, has ruled that a homeowners’ insurance policy did not cover a lawsuit alleging that the insured shot the owner of a jewelry mart multiple times during an attempted armed robbery.
Deal Watch: Skadden, Sidley, Slaughter and S&C Lead Big Paper Deal, While Private Funds Grow Massive
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
