X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Partners, Rebecca Kaufman and Anthony Glassman, Bergeson, LLP (Photo: Courtesy Photo) Partners, Rebecca Kaufman and Anthony Glassman, Bergeson, LLP (Photo: Courtesy Photo)

Defamation plaintiffs rejoice! The California Supreme Court recently issued a ruling in a speech case, FilmOn.com v. DoubleVerify, 2019 Cal. LEXIS 3042, 2019 WL 1984290, that curtails the until now seemingly ever-expanding notion of whether speech “is in connection with” a matter of public interest and therefore falls within the ambit of the widely abused anti-SLAPP statute. Never before had a California court articulated a formula for determining whether something “is in connection with” a matter of public interest. Courts must now determine whether a statement, even if the content touches on a general area of public interest, contributes to or furthers the public conversation on that issue of public interest.

Library of California Insurance Defense FormsBook

180+ model documents covering preliminary matters through ADR & trial, with sample letters, demands, pleadings, motions, certifications, interrogatories, settlement agreements, briefs & more.
Get More Information

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.