Monsanto Hit With $2B in Punitives in Oakland Roundup Trial
The verdict marked the third time that a Bay Area jury has held Monsanto's blockbuster herbicide responsible of causing cancer in humans.
May 13, 2019 at 05:26 PM
3 minute read
OAKLAND—Jurors in California have hit Monsanto Co. with a $1 billion punitive damages verdict for each plaintiff in the third trial claiming that the blockbuster herbicide Roundup causes cancer in humans.
The jury of seven men and five women also awarded the plaintiffs Alva and Alberta Pilliod millions, about $55 million in past and future economic and noneconomic damages.
The trial is the third to allege that Roundup caused someone to get non-Hodgkin lymphoma but is by far-and-away the largest. On Aug. 10, jurors in San Francisco County Superior Court awarded $289 million to Dewayne “Lee” Johnson, a school groundskeeper whose case moved up for trial due to his poor health. San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Suzanne Bolanos reduced the award to $78.5 million, which Monsanto has appealed.
Jurors in federal court in San Francisco handed down an $80 million award March 27 for Edwin Hardeman, who alleged he got non-Hodgkin lymphoma two decades of using Roundup to kill weeds on his 56-acre property in Sonoma County.
The third trial involved a California couple, Alva and Alberta Pilliod, who alleged they both got non-Hodgkin lymphoma after spraying their property with Roundup. Alameda County Superior Court Judge Winifred Smith has been overseeing the trial, which began March 28.
The courtroom remained silent Monday afternoon as the verdict was read. But the plaintiffs team, led by Brent Wisner of the Los Angeles office of Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman, who also handled the Johnson trial, embraced each other and the two plaintiffs after jurors were dismissed and left the courtroom. Wisner's co-counsel, Michael Miller of The Miller Law Firm in Orange, Virginia, turned to Wisner at the trial's end and said, “You're a hell of a lawyer.”
Jury member Doug Olsen, speaking to reporters outside the courtroom, said the verdict was meant to have a “punch-in-the-gut effect” on the company. A Bayer spokesman said that the company was disappointed with Monday's verdict.
“We have great sympathy for Mr. and Mrs. Pilliod, but the evidence in this case was clear that both have long histories of illnesses known to be substantial risk factors for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), most NHL has no known cause, and there is not reliable scientific evidence to conclude that glyphosate-based herbicides were the 'but for' cause of their illnesses as the jury was required to find in this case,” the spokesman said.
This past week, Monsanto raised a host of concerns about Wednesday's closing arguments, such as plaintiffs attorneys referring to champagne on ice in its boardrooms or taking photos with actor Daryl Hannah in front of jurors.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Judge Asks: Is It Time to End Ken Feinberg's Roundup Settlement Program?
7 minute readWhy the Wide Range of Roundup Verdicts? It Might Depend on What Juries Hear About the EPA
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Suburban Pa. Jury Hands Up $29M to Bicyclist Hit by Truck
- 2Andrew Cuomo's Attorneys Seek to Gag Accusers' Counsel from Discussing Taxpayer-Funded Defense Costs
- 3Gibson Dunn Adds Senior SEC Enforcement Official
- 4Spoliation of Evidence Costs Defendants Nearly $850K in Sanction Award
- 5Supreme Court to Hear Lanham Act Case With Broad Implications on Corporate Structure, Liability
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250