Cooley, Covington, Davis Polk Get Big Bonus From Uber IPO
Cooley, Covington & Burling, Davis Polk & Wardwell are collecting $5.5 million in legal fees and expenses for Uber IPO work.
May 10, 2019 at 10:22 AM
4 minute read
Uber's stock is now for purchase on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “UBER,” as the company aims make the largest IPO by a U.S.-based company since Facebook.
The San Francisco-based ride-hailing giant turned to Cooley and Covington & Burling for legal services related to the long-awaited IPO, with Davis Polk & Wardwell serving as underwriter counsel.
According to Uber's updated IPO prospectus, filed April 26, the three law firms are collecting $5.5 million in legal fees and expenses for the IPO work. The filing also discloses that attorneys at Cooley have a beneficial interest in an aggregate of less than 0.03 percent of Uber's common stock.
With a total of 207 million shares registered, valued at $45 per share, 0.03 percent of Uber's common stock would be valued at $2.79 million.
Uber is selling 180 million shares of its common stock in the IPO, which at $45 a share would allow the company to raise $8.1 billion.
The IPO price, which is near the bottom of its expected price range, gives Uber a market value of almost $74 billion. On a fully diluted basis, including restricted stock units and other shares, Uber has an implied market valuation of $82.4 billion.
Besides Uber's massive IPO, Cooley also grabbed the lead last month on PagerDuty and Zoom's public offerings, each of which generated $1.5 million in legal fees.
Palo Alto-based Cooley, which began asking clients for pre-IPO stock as a matter of course in mid-1999, said it saw a significant uptick in its capital markets practice in the recent year. In a February interview with The Recorder, Cooley's CEO Joseph Conroy said his firm advised on more than 175 public offerings in 2018 and represented banks in about half of those offerings.
Fueled by the increased demand for capital markets work, Cooley reported gross revenue of $1.23 billion last year, an increase of 14.4% from $1.07 billion in 2017. The firm's net income also skyrocketed by nearly 24% to $535.6 million.
Uber's offering is by far the biggest tech IPO so far this year and the largest one on a U.S. exchange since China-based Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.'s $25 billion global record holder in 2014. The American Lawyer reported in 2014, Alibaba paid $15.8 million in legal fees to law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett and other attorneys who advised the e-commerce giant on its IPO.
Uber's rival, Lyft, reported $1.4 million in legal fees and expenses for its IPO in late March. Lyft's stock plummeted about 35 percent since its IPO.
Both ride-hailing companies are unprofitable. In its SEC filings, Uber reported 2018 revenue of $11.27 billion, net income of $997 million and adjusted EBITDA losses of $1.85 billion.
Just a few days before Uber's IPO, thousands of Uber and Lyft drivers stayed off the road, striking for better pay and benefits. The Recorder affiliate Corporate Counsel reported Thursday that Uber has set aside $146 million to $170 million to settle misclassification claims filed by 60,000 U.S. drivers.
Read More
Cooley, Covington, Davis Polk Land Work on Massive Uber IPO
In Latest Tech IPO Frenzy, Big Brands Make for More Legal Work
Uber Settles Thousands of Driver Misclassification Claims Before IPO
Wilson Sonsini Rides Ride-Hailing Boom, Sharing in Lyft IPO Fees
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllO'Melveny Secures Global Clearances for Korean Air-Asiana Merger
FTC Bans Exec From Chevron Board—Exercising Authority It Doesn't Have, GOP Dissenters Say
5 minute readDeal Watch: Latham, Ropes, S&C, Cravath and Simpson Advise on Massive Paramount/Skydance Deal
6 minute readMunger Tolles Advises New Stability AI CEO, Executive Chairman in Funding Deal
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250