Williams-Sonoma went into San Francisco federal court Tuesday with its claim that Amazon.com has created “a fake Williams-Sonoma website” on its platform, while Amazon argued for the right to resell others’ merchandise without having to face ginned-up claims about consumer confusion.

Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe partner Annette Hurst for Williams Sonoma and Durie Tangri partner Mark Lemley for Amazon ran into a judge who admitted to being a power user of Amazon. U.S. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Laporte of the Northern District of California said it’s clear to her personally that when Amazon adds the words “by Williams-Sonoma” to Williams-Sonoma merchandise, that simply means Amazon is acting a reseller, which is legal.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]