Judge Rules State AGs ACA Lawsuit May Proceed Despite Government Shutdown
A federal judge in D.C., citing a risk of life and property, said the case falls within one of the exceptions allowed during the ongoing shutdown.
December 28, 2018 at 06:52 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Federal judges across the country are letting some cases come to a halt while government lawyers are sidelined by the shutdown, but the U.S. Labor Department had no such luck in its bid to stay a multistate suit regarding a rule taking effect Jan. 1 that would allegedly weaken consumer protections under the Affordable Care Act.
U.S. District Judge John Bates of the District of Columbia said in a short ruling Friday that while he is “sympathetic” to the lapse in appropriations to some governmental agencies, the Labor Department remains fully funded.
In the federal courts, its business as usual for criminal proceedings during the shutdown, but according to the latest contingency plan, civil litigation “will be curtailed or postponed to the extent that this can be done without compromising to a significant degree the safety of human life or the protection of property.”
In the case before Bates, Department of Justice lawyers appeared for the Labor Department in a move to stay filing a joint appendix in the litigation by Jan. 2. The DOJ lawyers cited the lapse in appropriations that began at the end of the day Dec. 21 as the reason for their request. But Bates said the only outstanding item at this point is meeting and conferring about the contents of the appendix, which will be submitted by the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs are a group of 12 state attorneys general that includes New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood and California's Xavier Becerra, who allege a new rule promulgated by the Labor Department will allow associations to offer health plans that need not comply with protections contained within the Affordable Care Act.
The attorneys general argue the new rule amounts to “nothing more than an unlawful end run around the consumer protections enshrined in the Affordable Care Act.”
In opposing the motion to stay the suit, the state AGs argued the implementation of the new rule will disrupt health insurance markets and cause financial harm. That means any work by the government attorneys during the shutdown would fall within the Antideficiency Act, which allows the government to function for the sake of protecting property.
The government's motions to stay civil litigation in other courts have been met with mixed results.
U.S. District Judge William Kuntz II of the Eastern District of New York denied the government's motion to stay litigation in a lawsuit challenging Homeland Security's 2017 rescission of temporary protected status for Haitian immigrants.
But one of Kuntz's colleagues in the Eastern District, Magistrate Judge Ramon Reyes Jr., saw things the government's way in one of his civil cases.
Reyes stayed litigation in a lawsuit filed by an inmate at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn who alleges that corrections staffers failed to heed warnings that a fearsome MS-13 gang member housed there was carrying weapons and, ultimately, the gang member assaulted the plaintiff with a pair of socks stuffed with padlocks.
Meanwhile, across the East River at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Judge Colleen McMahon issued an order staying all litigation in matters where attorneys from the civil division at the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan appear as counsel, except civil forfeiture cases.
McMahon issued the order in response to a letter from Jeffrey Oestericher, chief of the Civil Division, who said that Main Justice has instructed that furloughed AUSAs and staff are prohibited from working during the shutdown, even as volunteers.
In Washington, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss of the District of Columbia on Thursday declined to pause briefing deadlines in a suit challenging the Trump administration's asylum ban.
U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. in California on Thursday also denied the government's request to stay proceedings in a suit challenging the Trump administration's restrictions to access contraceptives under the Affordable Care Act.
Read more:
Some Federal Judges Spurn DOJ's Push to Pause Cases During Shutdown
NY Risk Adjustment Rule Paused as UnitedHealthcare Appeals Dismissal of Challenge
NY AG Candidate Questionnaire: Letitia 'Tish' James, Democrat, New York City Public Advocate
NY Financial Regulator May Redistribute Federal Health Subsidy, US Judge Rules
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHueston Hennigan Secures Dismissal of SEC Action Against Ex-PwC Auditor in Mattel-Linked Case
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250