Here's Who Passed California's July 2018 Bar Exam
State bar leaders noted that California's 40.7 percent pass rate on the exam mirrors a similar drop across the country.
November 19, 2018 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
The pass rate for California's July 2018 bar exam was historically brutal.
Overshadowed by that gloomy news, 3,284 test-takers did succeed and, once they fulfill all the other bar requirements, they'll be licensed to practice law in the Golden State. The state bar released their names on Sunday.
A quick scan of the list shows that 59 applicants from Washington, D.C., passed the test as did 23 registered with a New York City address. Eight people from Cambridge, Massachusetts—hello, Harvard University—were on the list, which is more than the number of successful test-takers from Canada (seven), the United Kingdom (seven), China (six) and Hong Kong (six). Ten would-be California lawyers from the Republic of Korea passed.
State bar leaders noted that California's 40.7 percent pass rate on the exam mirrors a similar drop across the country. California test-takers, however, continue to post a higher average score on the multistate bar exam than those in other states.
“Our cut score means you aren't good enough for CA (but plenty good enough in other states),” California bar trustee Joanna Mendoza tweeted Saturday. “The unfortunate consequence is less about qualifications, but directly hurts diversity and inclusion in our profession. That has a further direct negative impact on access to justice and hurts the public. This needs to be fixed.”
The thing I can't shake about the abysmal @StateBarCA bar exam pass rate is that the examinees continue to do better on the multistate exam than the rest of the country. However, our cut score means you aren't good enough for CA (but plenty good enough in other states).
— Joanna Mendoza (@CalBarTrustee) November 17, 2018
Federal lawmakers and some state lawmakers pressed the California Supreme Court last year to lower the bar exam's cut score, or the minimum score needed to pass the test. The justices told bar leaders in October 2017 that they were “not persuaded” by available studies and data that they needed to reduce the score, now the second highest in the nation behind Delaware.
The bar is currently conducting a study of what job skills new lawyers need and whether the exam adequately tests for them.
The names of the individuals who passed the California exam are posted below:
Read more:
Nearly Six in 10 Failed California's July 2018 Bar Exam
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFarella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
'Nerve-Wracking': Fires Disrupting but Not Halting Work of Distributed Firms' LA Lawyers
3 minute readMiami Judge Approves Shaq's $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
3 minute readCrypto Exchange’s ‘Meteoric Rise’ Leads to Nationwide Class Action Trend
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
- 2‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
- 3Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 4Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
- 5DOT Nominee Duffy Pledges Safety, Faster Infrastructure Spending in Confirmation Hearing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250