Plaintiffs Lawyers Hit Facebook Algorithm in Age-Bias Job Recruitment Suit
“The takeaway here is that algorithms may not care about civil rights laws, but we do and the law does,” Outten & Golden's Peter Romer-Friedman says. Facebook is not a defendant in the case, where major U.S. companies are accused of violating employment law in recruitment practices that use the social media company's advertising platforms.
May 29, 2018 at 05:35 PM
4 minute read
A group of major U.S. companies that use Facebook's platforms to advertise job opportunities violated state and federal employment law by discriminating against older applicants, according to a newly amended complaint filed Tuesday in San Francisco federal district court.
The complaint, which now includes federal claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and additional California state claims, alleges hundreds of companies that use Facebook to advertise job postings discriminate against older workers by targeting ads exclusively to a younger demographic. The original complaint was filed in December.
The litigation is unfolding as Facebook's advertising platform comes under increased scrutiny on a variety of fronts. U.S. lawmakers and the AARP have criticized the social media giant's advertising practices. The law firm Outten & Golden, which brought the California suit, has filed dozens of age-bias allegations with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against Facebook and other companies.
➤➤ Get employment law news and commentary straight to your in-box with Labor of Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
The plaintiffs, including the Communications Workers of America, said the EEOC on May 10 issued a right-to-sue letter regarding claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Separately, the plaintiffs said they received a right-to-sue letter on May 22 from the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing.
The lawsuit identifies by name dozens of employers—including T-Mobile, Amazon.com, Cox Communications and Capital One—that use Facebook to send job and employment-related ads allegedly hidden from older workers. Defendants have denied that their recruitment efforts are discriminatory.
An Amazon spokesperson said in a statement: “Amazon is an equal opportunity employer. We follow all state and federal employment laws, but we have a longstanding practice of not commenting on pending litigation. Our approach is and always has been to seek all qualified candidates over the age of 18.”
The amended complaint also targets Facebook's algorithm itself, alleging that it uses age to decide which users will receive job advertisements. Facebook is not a named defendant in the California case.
“Facebook itself decides within a population selected by an employer or employment agency to receive a job advertisement which Facebook users will actually receive the advertisement, and in making this decision about which users will receive the job ads Facebook considers the age of its users; and often, this means that a disproportionate number of job ads are sent to younger workers instead of older workers,” the complaint said.
Outten & Golden's Peter Romer-Friedman in Washington said the plaintiffs “plan to use every tool in our toolbox to stop the practice and make sure that they treat everyone fairly moving forward. The allegation that the algorithm discriminates against older workers is an extremely important one.”
A Facebook spokesperson was not reached for comment about the amended complaint.
The lawsuit asks the court, among other things, to declare that the advertising and recruitment practices violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the suit seeks an injunction that stops companies “from continuing to engage in acts that violate the same federal and state statutes.”
A U.S. Senate committee has launched an investigation into age discrimination practices highlighted in the lawsuit. Romer-Friedman said addressing this issue could represent the wave of the future in discrimination cases.
“The takeaway here is that algorithms may not care about civil rights laws, but we do and the law does,” Romer-Friedman said. “We plan to hold Facebook accountable regardless of how or why it discriminates. This is a sign that we are stepping up our efforts to enforce the law.”
Read more:
Companies Unlawfully Used Facebook Job Ads to Exclude Older Workers, Suit Claims
Age Discrimination Law Protects Applicants, Not Just Employees: US Appeals Court
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFarella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
'Nerve-Wracking': Fires Disrupting but Not Halting Work of Distributed Firms' LA Lawyers
3 minute readMiami Judge Approves Shaq's $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
3 minute readCrypto Exchange’s ‘Meteoric Rise’ Leads to Nationwide Class Action Trend
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Grapple With The Corporate Transparency Act
- 2FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
- 3‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
- 4Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 5Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250