Lawyers on both sides of a high-profile case against Hyundai, citing a circuit split, have asked an en banc appeals panel to upend a ruling that they say threatens the future of nationwide class action settlements.

In dual petitions for rehearing filed on Thursday before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, plaintiffs attorneys and lawyers for defendants Hyundai Motor America and Kia Motors America Inc. both argued that an en banc panel should review a Jan. 23 decision that conflicts with the Third Circuit, and its own precedent. The 2-1 decision, which decertified the nationwide class in their settlement, also is contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Amchem Products v. Windsor, they wrote.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]