California Seeks Input on Public Bank Option for Cannabis Industry
"Jeff Sessions has taken us steps backwards," state Treasurer John Chiang said. "And so it's crystal clear that we're going to have to face some additional challenges."
January 30, 2018 at 06:58 PM
4 minute read
California Treasurer John Chiang said Tuesday his office will commission a report to gauge the feasibility of creating a public bank to serve the cannabis industry.
Chiang, a candidate for governor, told reporters he's seeking an extensive road map exploring what such an institution could look like, from its basic structure to how it would be funded to what lending standards should be put in place “if you lend.” The Attorney General's Office has agreed to study any legal obstacles facing the bank's possible formation, he said.
Creating a state-backed bank to serve cannabis businesses turned away by traditional financial institutions was one of the ideas studied last year by a Chiang-appointed working group. Chiang has not endorsed the notion, and as late as December 2016 he said he didn't support building a public bank just to handle marijuana customers. On Tuesday, the treasurer said something has to be done after U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions discouraged already-skittish private banks from taking cannabis clients by rescinding the Cole Memo.
“Jeff Sessions has taken us steps backwards,” Chiang said. “And so it's crystal clear that we're going to have to face some additional challenges.”
Nine states, including California, and the District of Columbia have legalized recreational marijuana. None of them, however, have created a public bank to handle receipts from legal sales.
The state of Washington, for example, credits a rigorous and transparent sales reporting system with giving six state-chartered banks and credit unions enough assurances to serve its industry. Ninety percent of marijuana excise taxes in the state are paid by check or other noncash methods.
Two major obstacles to launching a public bank are the massive cash infusion it would require and finding insurance—backing from traditional public agencies would not be available to an institution serving marijuana clients. Any proposal would likely encounter opposition from the private banking industry, which has historically opposed any talk of public institutions, whether they're aimed at marijuana clients or not.
“Ultimately what's needed is some sort of solution from the federal government,” said Beth Mills, spokeswoman for the California Bankers Association.
Officials with California's Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency met with credit union and bank leaders in December to float the idea of creating a private network of institutions to serve marijuana businesses. The proposal has not gained any traction. A state senator introduced framework legislation this month to attract bankers to the industry, but he has yet to release any details.
Chiang said he expects to advertise this spring for consultants and think tanks interested in conducting the feasibility study. A final report should be submitted by the end of the year, he said. Chiang's term as treasurer ends in January 2019.
Read more:
Paul Hastings Will Lobby on Marijuana for Mobile Payments Venture
Marijuana Dispensary, Pointing to Jeff Sessions, Seeks Immunity in IRS Audit Case
Cannabis-Industry Lawyer Raises Questions After His Bank Terminates Account
Sacramento Boutique, in New Suit, Confronts 'Loophole' in Cannabis Regs
James Cole's Marijuana Memo Just Got Revoked. Here's What He Thinks About That.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLA-Area Law Firms Offer Support as Region Reckons With Raging Wildfires
Apple GC’s Compensation Flat Again in 2024, but She Might Snag No. 1 Spot on Top-Paid List Anyway
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: NYPD Officer's Sexual Assault of Informant Occurred Outside Scope of Employment
- 2'Not the President's Personal Lawyer': Lawyers Share Concerns Over How AG Pick Bondi’s Loyalism to Trump May Impact DOJ
- 3US Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
- 4The Demise of Truth and Transparency in Federal Sentencing
- 5Former Phila. Solicitor Sozi Tulante Rejoins Dechert
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250