Here's the July 2017 California Bar Exam Pass List
Now, once again, anyone can see the names of those who scored a coveted 144 or higher on the California bar exam, as well as their home zip codes.
November 22, 2017 at 03:55 PM
2 minute read
Celebrating success on California's bar exam is an international experience. Just ask the 15 victorious test-takers from Japan who found out last week that they passed the latest version of the notoriously difficult test. Or the successful dozen from China. Or the 10 from Canada.
The worldwide interest in becoming a California lawyer is just one of the tidbits to be gleaned from the pass list published on the state bar's website. The public list took a brief hiatus amid bar officials' concerns about test-takers privacy. But the pass list for the July exam sitting re-emerged early Sunday morning thanks to recently passed state legislation that permitted the posting.
Now, once again, anyone can see the names of those who scored a coveted 144 or higher on the test, as well as their home zip codes. Data-miners can see that Beverly Hills 90210 is looking good with 11 residents who passed the test, but San Diego's 92101 is even better with 45 people who are about to become California lawyers.
The angst over the bar exam, its passing score and its validity continue. But here's the list of 4,236 successful test-takers who don't have to worry about that anymore.
The July 2017 California bar exam pass list is posted below.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Coalition of AGs Support Updates to ABA's Legal Education Diversity Standard
3 minute read
California Supreme Court Rejects State Bar's Initial Plan for New Bar Exam
4 minute read
Governor Signs Legislation Raising Lawyers' Licensing Fees by $88 in 2025
3 minute read
California Bar Wants to Offer Exam Score Boosts, Payments to Sample Test Guinea Pigs
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for law firm Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Robert A. Fumerton, Scott D. Musoff, Michael C. Griffin and Judith 'Judy' A. Flumenbaum of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have entered appearances for PDD Holdings f/k/a Pinduoduo in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Oct. 1 in New York Eastern District Court by the Rosen Law Firm, contends that the defendants concealed the company's sale of goods likely produced by forced labor and its efforts to install malware on users' phones, exacerbating the risk of regulatory and public scrutiny. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Marutollo, is 1:24-cv-06950, Shaw v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Nicholas M. DePalma and Christian R. Schreiber of Venable have stepped in to represent CP Management Services, CRS RB4 Holdings and other defendants in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 30 in Virginia Eastern District Court by Greenberg Traurig on behalf of Daito Kentaku USA. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton, is 1:24-cv-01538, Daito Kentaku USA, LLC v. Comstock Partners, LC.
Who Got The Work
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs partner Andrew J. Pulliam has entered an appearance for Steve Jensen in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The action, filed Aug. 30 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the Law Office of Perry A. Craft on behalf of Timothy Robins, accuses the defendant of writing a worthless check for over $94,000 for the sale of auctioned goods. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Eli J. Richardson, is 3:24-cv-01064, Robins v. Jensen et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
