California Says Goodbye to Eric Holder Contract (Sort Of)
California's Assembly on Thursday ended its contract with Covington & Burling for guidance on fighting Trump administration policies—even as the state Senate pledged to continue working with the firm.
June 01, 2017 at 06:55 PM
3 minute read
SACRAMENTO—California's Assembly on Thursday ended its contract with Covington & Burling for guidance on fighting Trump administration policies—even as the state Senate pledged to continue working with the firm.
Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, D-Paramount, said lawmakers had received “valuable guidance” since leaders first signed the $25,000-a-month legal services agreement in January. He offered no explanation for dropping the Covington team led by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Jr.
“We will continue to seek their guidance as the need arises,” Rendon said.
Dan Reeves, chief of staff to Senate leader Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, said in an email that Covington's counsel had been “very valuable … in responding to the Trump administration's sustained attack on California's policies and values.”
“We currently have a number of ongoing projects with Covington and plan to continue that valuable relationship,” Reeves said. He did not respond to questions about what those projects are and who would pay for firm's work going forward.
A spokesman for Covington & Burling did not return a message on Thursday.
State Democrats, with large majorities in both houses, touted the contract in early January as the first step in building a firewall against any attack by President Donald Trump's on California's immigration, environment and health care policies. The state was on the verge then of losing its attorney general, Kamala Harris, who was elected to the U.S. Senate, and both Rendon and de Leon said California needed legal assistance on federal issues.
State Republicans derided the hiring of the Covington team, arguing that Democrats should rely instead on career attorneys in the Attorney General's Office and in the Legislature.
Since February, Covington's services—capped at 40 hours a month—have not produced much visible work. Holder briefly appeared with legislative leaders in Sacramento on Feb. 7 for meetings and a photo opportunity. In April, the firm sent a letter on behalf of the Legislature to U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, challenging their allegations that the state is hampering enforcement of federal immigration laws.
On Thursday, Assembly Republicans posted a snarky tweet of a blank list of Covington accomplishments, suggesting California taxpayers haven't gotten their money's worth.
“This was an unjustifiable contract of dubious legality,” said Assemblyman Kevin Kiley, R-Roseville. “The responsible parties should refund California taxpayers the $100,000 they paid for it.”
Kiley has asked Attorney General Xavier Becerra for a legal opinion on whether the Legislature had the authority to hire Covington. An aide to the assemblyman said Thursday he has not received a response.
Senior legislative staff disputed Republican accusations that the Covington contract had not been fruitful. The firm's lawyers offered guidance on understanding and responding to Trump's executive orders, including laws affecting so-called sanctuary cities, as well as the president's moves targeting climate change, federal energy policy and the Affordable Care Act.
Copyright The Recorder. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look at Big Law Partner Donors to Trump and Harris in California
Big Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readRussia-Linked Deepfakes Are Hitting the US Election. Will It Spur Congress to Act?
Trending Stories
- 1Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 2‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 3State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 4Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
- 522-Count Indictment Is Just the Start of SCOTUSBlog Atty's Legal Problems, Experts Say
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250