Board's affirmance of WCJ's modification of claimant's benefits was reversed to the extent that it modified claimant's workers' compensation benefits from full to partial because under Protz v. Worker's Compensation Appeal Bd., 161 A.3d 827, §306(a.2) was stricken and thus, no provision of the act allowed for modification of benefits based on an IRE. Reversed.
September 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM
1 minute read
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Worker’s Compensation Benefits • Impairment Rating Evaluation • Section 306(a.2) • Modification of Benefits
Thompson v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Bd., PICS Case No. 17-1352 (Pa. Commw. Aug. 16, 2017) Brobson, J. (9 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
