PERSONAL INJURY
Business Invitee • Negligence • Duty to Protect • Duty to Aid
Trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of store in appellant's action based on fight she had with a third party in the store because appellant was a business invitee, there was no evidence of any past violence or issues with or by the third party in the store and store satisfied its duty to aid by calling the police. Affirmed.
September 12, 2017 at 10:56 AM
1 minute read
PERSONAL INJURY
Business Invitee • Negligence • Duty to Protect • Duty to Aid
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS