Two Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices took issue with their colleagues' decision to allow authorities to hold a jeweler's entire inventory during the course of a burglary investigation.
September 01, 2017 at 12:07 AM
1 minute read
Two Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices took issue with their colleagues’ decision to allow authorities to hold a jeweler’s entire inventory during the course of a burglary investigation.
Justice David N. Wecht, joined by Justice Christine Donohue in his dissent to a high court order allowing Montgomery County authorities to hold 50,000 pieces of jewelry belonging to Jasmeen Kaur and DUA Diamonds, said the court’s decision means law enforcement can seize property with impunity.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
